Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Ogle v. Pittman et al (RHC)
as 3:2014cv00486
Plaintiff:
Michael A Ogle
Defendant:
Chuck Pittman, U.S. Marshal, James Barrons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogle v. Barrons et al
as 3:2014cv00458
Defendant:
James Barrons, Pamela J. Hammonds, Donna H Wheeler and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A Ogle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogle v. Pittman et al
as 3:2014cv00451
Plaintiff:
Michael A Ogle
Defendant:
Chuck Pittman, Sheriff Barrons, Chief French and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogle v. Barrons et al
as 3:2014cv00454
Plaintiff:
Michael A Ogle
Defendant:
Sheriff Barrons, House Holder, Officer Dudlly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogle v. Barrons et al
as 3:2014cv00457
Defendant:
Sheriff Barrons, Chief French, Captain Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A Ogle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogle v. Pittman et al
as 3:2014cv00456
Plaintiff:
Michael A Ogle
Defendant:
Chuck Pittman, Sheriff Barrons, Chief French and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ogle v. Slagle et al
as 3:2014cv00435
Plaintiff:
Michael A Ogle
Defendant:
Lt Slagle, Sheriff Barrons, Captain Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vinson v. Oldham et al
as 2:2012cv02770
Plaintiff:
James E. Vinson
Defendant:
Oldham, Tucker and Barron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wimbley v. USA
as 3:2011cv00123
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Barron Wimbley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Madoff v. Barron's dba Barron's.com a/k/a www.Barrons.com, et al
as 4:2009cv00048
Plaintiff:
Bernard Madoff doing business as Jonathan Lee Riches also known as Arthur Nadel and Arthur Nadel
Defendant:
Barron's doing business as Barron's.com also known as www.Barrons.com, Ward S McGuiness, Diane Sipprelle and others
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Dewalt
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
