Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BATTLE v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv03438
Petitioner:
JAMAR BATTLE
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BATTLE v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2021cv06123
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS L. BATTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BATTLE v. MCGANN et al
as 1:2017cv12041
Plaintiff:
J.P. BATTLE
Defendant:
MCGANN, PETER A. SARKOS and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ALEXANDER v. CAPE MAY COUNTY et al
as 1:2017cv01890
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ALEXANDER
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY, GARY G. SCHAFFER, DONALD J. LOMBARDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2016cv06862
Plaintiff:
DARREN BATTLE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL and CAMDEN COUNTY FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. C.C.C.F. et al
as 1:2016cv06158
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BATTLE
Defendant:
C.C.C.F. and C.C. FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06026
Plaintiff:
DARREN BATTLE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE et al v. OMALLEY et al
as 2:2015cv07037
Plaintiff:
KOCTRELL BATTLE and INMATES OF UNION COUNTY CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
JILL OMALLEY, UNION COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and GRACE H. PARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATTLE v. THE CITY OF ELIZABETH et al
as 2:2015cv06737
Plaintiff:
KOCTRELL BATTLE
Defendant:
ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALEXANDER GONZALEZ and MICHAEL NICOLAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BATTLE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv02024
Petitioner:
TERRY BATTLE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
