Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Burley v. Waybourn
as 24-10988
Petitioner:
Rasheed Akeem Burley
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn, Sheriff, Tarrant County and State of Texas
Bramlett v. Waybourn
as 4:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
William Dale Bramlett
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hallman v. Waybourn
as 4:2024cv00544
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Petitioner:
Robert F Hallman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Junes et al
as 4:2024cv00463
Defendant:
Judge Steven Junes, Bill Waybourn, Blaine Schurle and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easter v. Court Room 485th District Court et al
as 4:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jordan Easter and Jordan Beavers
Defendant:
Court Room 485th District Court, Judge Steven James and DA Jamie Jernigan
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sullens v. Waybourn
as 4:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Everett Jesse Sullens
Respondent:
Sheriff Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Aguilar v. The State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Raymond Alexander Aguilar, Jr.
Respondent:
The State of Texas and Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salas v. Waybboun
as 4:2023cv01254
Petitioner:
Gabriel Salas
Respondent:
Sheriff Bill Waybboun and Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burley v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2023cv01197
Petitioner:
Rasheed Akeem Burley
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Brown v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv01105
Petitioner:
Braylin Lamont Brown
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
