Cases 1 - 10 of 20
YOUNG v. KELLY et al
as 4:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
DAVHON YOUNG
Defendant:
ROBERT KELLY and SAVANNAH BINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00508
Petitioner:
Wesley A. Bingham
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimenez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
David Jimenez
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Steven Bingham, Robin Lynne Allweiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Bingham v. Mathis et al
as 8:2020cv00128
Defendant:
City of St. Petersburg Health Department and Precious Ann Mathis
Plaintiff:
Trentair Lavent Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bingham v. Waller
as 8:2019cv03017
Defendant:
JeMarckus Waller
Plaintiff:
Trentair L. Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bingham v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2019cv01090
Defendant:
State of Florida, Josh Riba, Michael Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Trentair L. Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BINGHAM v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2019cv01262
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and SCOTT DUNCAN
Plaintiff:
TRENTAIR BINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bingham v. State of Florida et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2019cv00876
Respondent:
Santa Rosa, State of Florida, Sixth Judicial Circuit Of Pinellas County and others
Petitioner:
Trentair Bingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BINGHAM v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2019cv00576
Respondent:
SANTA ROSA, STATE OF FLORIDA, SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF PINELLAS COUNTY and others
Petitioner:
TRENTAIR BINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
