Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Henderson v. Chambers
as 1:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
Tavarres Henderson
Respondent:
Brian K. Chambers
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibby v. Scott et al
as 2:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Brian K Gibby
Defendant:
Gibb Scott, Gerald Couch, Brian Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tidmore v. Georgia Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00883
Petitioner:
Brian K. Tidmore
Respondent:
Georgia Dept of Corrections, Wheeler Correctional Facility, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. State of Georgia, et al et al
as 4:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
State of Georgia, et al, Polk County Georgia, et al, Baldwin County CSH Georgia, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaither v. Epps, et al.
as 1:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Russell Gaither
Defendant:
Brian K. Epps and Dudley H. Bowen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAITHER v. EPPS et al
as 1:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL GAITHER
Defendant:
BRIAN K EPPS and DUDLEY H BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Smith et al
as 5:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
Corey Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Brian K. Smith, Edina Johnson and Department of Corrections, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Polk County, Baldwin County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Smith et al
as 2:2013cv00242
Plaintiff:
Brian K. Roberts
Defendant:
Judd Smith and Chad Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. Morris et al
as 4:2008cv00051
Plaintiff:
Steven Victor Flemming
Defendant:
Cynthia G Morris, Brian K Stevenson, J P Scott and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
