Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Bright v. Harmon
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Carnell W. Bright
Defendant:
Ricky Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bright v. Clark et al
as 5:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Carnell Bright
Defendant:
FNU Clark and FNU Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Fabrizio et al
as 0:2024cv60303
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Adams
Defendant:
Officer Ryan Fabrizio, Sergeant Steve Lambert, Detective Eddy Velazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bright v. Suwannee Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2022cv01308
Plaintiff:
Russell Bright
Defendant:
Suwannee Correctional Institution and Mayo Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bright v. Serrano
as 1:2022cv21594
Plaintiff:
Edward Bright
Defendant:
S. Serrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Woolfork et al v. Desantis et al
as 2:2021cv00528
Petitioner:
Jeremy Woolfork, Jeremey Woolfork, Joshua Andrew Finley and others
Respondent:
Ron Desantis, Amira D. Fox and Kathleen Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIGHT v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2021cv00674
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner:
ERIC RICHARDO BRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bright v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00262
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Cristy Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bright v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv01133
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Corey Q. Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bright v. Department of Corrections, State of Florida
as 3:2020cv00673
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida
Petitioner:
Raymond Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
