Cases 1 - 10 of 1,287
Moss, British v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv22387
Plaintiff:
British Moss
Defendant:
Terry Brown, Cary Dobson, Angela Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
WAMBLES v. BROWN
as 3:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
JAMIE WAMBLES
Defendant:
J BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warden, FCC Coleman-USP 1
as 5:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Brandon Evertt Brown
Respondent:
Shannon Withers, Federal Bureau of Prisons - Central Office and Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barfield v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barfield
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, S. Pate, T.R. Mudd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dancy v. USP Coleman 1 Staff et al
as 5:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Larry Dancy
Defendant:
USP Coleman 1 Staff, S. Withers, FNU Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moss, British v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv21546
Plaintiff:
British Moss
Defendant:
Terry Browne, Cary Dobson, Angela Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. FOSKEY et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
DAVID BROWN
Defendant:
ELIAS FOSKEY and JOHN BUTLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Naphcare Health Care Services of Florida et al
as 8:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Brown, II
Defendant:
Naphcare Health Care Services of Florida and Dr. Ogaga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doctor v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Armando Jermaal Doctor
Defendant:
Barnes, Brown, James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JESSE ALAN WALKER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, JAMES COKER, TIMOTHY NOLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
