Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00386
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01830
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01441
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DeVore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2022cv01407
Plaintiff:
Raymond Earl DeVore
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Office of Information Policy and Matthew W. Hurd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv01004
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Northwest Regional Reentry Center, Oregon District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeVore v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv01646
Plaintiff:
Raymond Earl DeVore
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Select Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv00767
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Springfield Missouri Medical Center Federal Prisoners
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2020cv00764
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Officer Pennington and Officer MacDonald
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00383
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00209
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
