Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jackson v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01478
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Byran Collier, Joey Ashton, Trey Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Buster Cole State Jail
as 4:2016cv01842
Plaintiff:
Brian Wayne Chambers
Defendant:
Buster Cole State Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson et al v. Open Records Unit, Dallas Police Department et al
as 6:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Allegiance Family Crown, Burger King Corp. and Dayrin Robinson
Defendant:
American Correctional Association, Block Buster Video, Ennis High School and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Streets v. Buster Cole State Jail
as 4:2014cv00577
Plaintiff:
John L Streets
Defendant:
Buster Cole State Jail, Ashley T Torres and Clayton D Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins v. Werner et al
as 4:2014cv00056
Plaintiff:
Donald Adkins
Defendant:
John Werner, Mary Karl, Damon Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Streets v. Buster Cole State Jail
as 4:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
John L Streets
Defendant:
Buster Cole State Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosin v. Thaler et al
as 4:2010cv04436
Plaintiff:
Richard Dean Rosin
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, A Janicek, Michael D Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2010cv00505
Petitioner:
Buster James Matthews
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Buster et al
as 5:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
Shaun Wilson
Defendant:
Randall Buster and Lubbock County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buster v. Quaterman
as 1:2009cv00611
Petitioner:
Thomas Earl Buster
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quaterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
