Cases 1 - 10 of 17
(PC) Romero Diaz v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023cv01758
Plaintiff:
Oscar Romero Diaz
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Pleasant Valley State Prison, PVSP Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Crosby et al
as 3:2022cv00878
Plaintiff:
Michael Barkarri Foster
Defendant:
C. Crosby, J. Puente, C. Parry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pratt v. Schrag et al
as 4:2021cv08217
Plaintiff:
Ryant Trimale Pratt
Defendant:
J. Schrag, K. Gisler, R. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cathy v. Kuzmicz et al
as 4:2019cv05932
Defendant:
R. Kuzmicz, K. Hood, M. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Cathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cowie v. Robertson et al
as 5:2019cv00145
Defendant:
Jim Robertson, K. Royal, T. S. Buchanan and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Cowie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Milliken v. Studervant et al
as 5:2018cv05326
Defendant:
R. K. Bell, M. Seese, D. Wilcox and others
Plaintiff:
James M. Milliken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Patton et al
as 3:2018cv03480
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Martinez
Defendant:
B. Patton, D. Melton and C. Parry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Suarez v. Beard et al
as 2:2018cv00340
Defendant:
Lee, Davis, Moua and others
Plaintiff:
Maher Conrad Suarez
Respondent:
Tucker, Partida and Garcia
Not Classified By Court:
Christopher Lipsey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rico v. Beard et al
as 2:2017cv01402
Plaintiff:
Jorge Andrade Rico
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard , Michael Stainer , Clark E. Ducart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. Ohta et al
as 4:2016cv06805
Plaintiff:
Kavin Maurice Rhodes
Defendant:
Sam Ohta, Peter Swarth, Antonio Bestard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
