Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Smith v. Hernandez et al
as 4:2022cv00023
Petitioner:
Franklin C Smith
Respondent:
Chief Hernandez, Officer Erik Rodriguez and Chief FNU Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dominguez et al
as 4:2022cv00022
Petitioner:
Franklin C Smith
Respondent:
Sheriff Danny Dominguez and Jail Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Parker
as 3:2020cv02947
Petitioner:
Kerry C Smith
Interested Party:
Opal Coleman
Respondent:
NFN Parker and Bobby Lumkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ahmadi v. Downey et al
as 4:2018cv00211
Plaintiff:
Bob Ahmadi
Defendant:
Brian Downey, Mendoza, Rabbiah Shabazz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sulak v. Beck et al
as 4:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
Walter G. Sulak
Defendant:
Martha Beck, R. Friedman, S. Lammers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Livingston et al
as 1:2015cv00192
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Keith Wayne Henson
Defendant:
Brad Livingston and C. Smith
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thurman v. Smith et al
as 1:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lewellyn Thurman
Defendant:
Joshua C Smith, Gilbert Cortez, Ray F Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Rupert et al
as 6:2014cv00364
Plaintiff:
Cedric C Smith
Defendant:
John Rupert, Brad Livingston and Bill Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Richy et al
as 6:2014cv00316
Plaintiff:
Cedric C Smith
Defendant:
Linda Richy, Bill Pierce and John Rupert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. Richy et al
as 6:2014cv00180
Plaintiff:
Anthony Best, Shelton Johnson, Jason Ortega and others
Defendant:
Linda Richy, Bill Pierce and John Rupert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
