Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Cardwell v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv02981
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lee Caldwell and Melvin Lee Cardwell
Defendant:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Madison County Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00343
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Thomas Mayfield, Asst. D. A. Bryon P. Buckley, Madison County Mississippi and others
Plaintiff:
Xavier Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Simon et al
as 3:2021cv00351
Defendant:
Warden Simon, Warden Momfort and C-O Clark
Plaintiff:
Xavier Caldwell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toomer v. Harris et al
as 1:2019cv00741
Plaintiff:
Jesse Carl Toomer
Defendant:
Jacklyn Myers, Amanda Harris and Unknown Caldwell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Milton et al
as 4:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
Cedric Dixon
Defendant:
Bennie Milton, James Haywood, Eddie Bounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perrette v. Jackson County ADC et al
as 1:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
James Monroe Perrette
Defendant:
Jackson County ADC, Unknown Splicer, Unknown Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v. Rasco et al
as 3:2016cv00214
Plaintiff:
Willie Stevenson, Jr.
Defendant:
Bill Rasco, Desoto County Sheriff's Department, Lee Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. DeSoto County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv00042
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wood
Defendant:
DeSoto County Sheriff's Department, Bill Rasco, Chad Wicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. Wood et al
as 1:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Morrow
Defendant:
April Wood, Trent Kelly and Joe Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Caldwell v. Shaw et al
as 3:2013cv00738
Plaintiff:
Martin Caldwell
Defendant:
Warden Shaw and L. Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
