Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dames v. Pigott et al
as 1:2018cv08352
Defendant:
New York City Health + Hospitals, New York City Dept. of Corrections, S. Bastian and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil M. Dames
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dublino v. Thomas et al
as 6:2018cv06010
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Dublino
Defendant:
James Thomas, Scott Harvey, Winegarden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. United States Public Defenders et al
as 1:2016cv06335
Defendant:
Daryl Blackly, Sandy Cagle, Kunya Kenta and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burroughs v. Petrone et al
as 9:2015cv00818
Plaintiff:
Lorcen Burroughs
Defendant:
Derrick Petrone, Ada Perez, K. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barton v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals et al
as 1:2015cv03200
Plaintiff:
Ivan Sean Barton
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Villarin, Nierva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Bellnier
as 1:2013cv00672
Petitioner:
Cecil Richardson
Respondent:
Joseph Bellnier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Sposato et al
as 2:2011cv06224
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe and Michael Sposato
Plaintiff:
Cecil Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Villacorta v. Supreme Court et al
as 1:2010cv09516
Petitioner:
Cecille Villacorta
Respondent:
Supreme Court and Andrew M. Cuomo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McMillian v. Koehler et al
as 1:2008cv01006
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Defendant:
E. Koehler, Allyn R. Sielaff, The City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harvey v. New York City Department of Corrections Rikers Island et al
as 1:2007cv00343
Plaintiff:
Cecil O. Harvey
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections Rikers Island, John Doe Otis, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
