Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
WAMPLER v. BARTLETT
as 1:2023cv00357
Petitioner: CECIL WAMPLER
Respondent: WARDEN BARTLETT and FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wingler v. Cecil County, Maryland We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00754
Petitioner: Ardle Wingler
Respondent: Cecil County, Maryland and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Luther et al
as 1:2020cv01621
Defendant: Sec. Wetzel, Perrigo(R) Manufacturer, Clay Pharmaceutical and others
Plaintiff: Lavon Cecil Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CAPOZZA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01449
Petitioner: LAVON CECIL SMITH
Respondent: MARK CAPOZZA and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ray v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2015cv01424
Plaintiff: Cecil Ray
Defendant: Ebbert, John Doe #1, Rosler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ray v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00282
Plaintiff: Cecil Ray
Defendant: United States Of America
Mediator: Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
STATE OF MARYLAND v. MUHAMMOD, EL
as 2:2012cv05183
Petitioner: STATE OF MARYLAND
Respondent: CECIL L. MUHAMMOD, EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02403
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WAMPLER v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 3:2010cv00148
Petitioner: CECIL WAMPLER
Respondent: BUREAU OF PRISONS and FCI LORETTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cannon v. Sabol
as 4:2009cv01945
Plaintiff: Frank Cecil Cannon
Defendant: Mary Sabol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?