Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Williams v. Winfrey
as 1:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams
Defendant:
Reginald L. Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollowell v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv04534
Petitioner:
JoVon Montell Hollowell
Respondent:
Warden Charles Williams, Robert A. Deyton Detention Facility and U.S. District Court of Northern Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wearing v. Robert A. Deyton Detention et al
as 1:2022cv03497
Plaintiff:
Rashad Andre Wearing
Defendant:
Robert A. Deyton Detention, GEO Group Incorporated, Warden Charles Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
NEGRIN v. MITCHUM et al
as 5:2020cv00399
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, JUDGE DAVID BROWN, SHERIFF DARREN MITCHUM and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC M NEGRIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2020cv00124
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CRAIG WOOD
Defendant:
CHARLES WILLIAMS, SAMUEL ANDREWS, QUINTON RICHARDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Adams
as 1:2019cv05075
Petitioner:
Charles William Perry
Respondent:
Robert Adams and Timothy C. Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOOD v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2019cv00041
Defendant:
Andrews, Wolcots, CHARLES WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CRAIG WOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Sellers et al
as 1:2018cv05662
Plaintiff:
Brandon Craig Wood
Defendant:
Charles Williams, Georgia Diagnostics and Classification Prison, Quinton Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dubie v. USA
as 3:2016cv00065
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Charles William Dubie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GIVENS v. ALLEN
as 7:2016cv00069
Petitioner:
CHARLES WILLIAM GIVENS
Respondent:
MARTY ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
