Cases 1 - 10 of 15
BRYANT v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
RONNIE BRYANT
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, MS LESLEY and ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHIE v. ACEVEDO et al
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEE ARCHIE, JR
Defendant:
JELO ACEVEDO and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARCHIE v. HILL et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEE ARCHIE, JR
Defendant:
OBRIAN ALEXAND HILL and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2023cv24667
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PETER PHILLIPS
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS and ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY CITY HALL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2023cv24632
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD ALEXANDER, JR
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY CITY HALL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2023cv23986
Plaintiff:
PERCY L HALL
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, CLARK, HINFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENSARLING v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2023cv17921
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EARL HENSARLING, JR
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL, CHIP SIMMONS and ROBERT LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOULTRIE v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2022cv23584
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER MOULTRIE
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL, CHIP SIMMONS and WES MORENO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2021cv01429
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, J HILL and SEVERAL UNKNOWN NAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKS v. BAISE et al
as 3:2021cv00950
Plaintiff:
BRYAN HICKS
Defendant:
KIRSTYN LYNN BAISE and CHIP SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
