Cases 1 - 10 of 821
Wrice v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv02261
Petitioner:
Christopher John Wrice
Respondent:
Micheal Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAMPBELL v. LOVE
as 4:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD CAMPBELL
Defendant:
Officer LOVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMERSON v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L AMERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN CURTIS L JEFFERIES, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02121
Petitioner:
Christopher McMillian
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HENDERSON v. CARR
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES HENDERSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER M CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. SRS Nuclear Power et al
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Tavarres Henderson
Defendant:
SRS Nuclear Power and Christopher M. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMillian v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Christopher McMillian
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
as 1:2024cv01878
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jose Adams
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALDEN v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WALDEN
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vass v. Brawner
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner:
Christopher Aaron Vass
Respondent:
Director Ronald Brawner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
