Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jones v. City of Oceanside et al
as 3:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
Wayne E. Jones
Respondent:
City of Oceanside and Oceanside Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spatcher v. City of Oceanside et al
as 3:2020cv01554
Defendant:
Officer Jeffrey Brandt, City of Oceanside and Officer Beatriz Gonzales
Plaintiff:
Gregory Leon Spatcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Spatcher v. City of Oceanside et al
as 3:2019cv02281
Defendant:
Beatriz Gonzales, Jeffrey Brandt and City of Oceanside
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Spatcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Haywood v. U.C. San Diego et al
as 3:2019cv01955
Defendant:
City of Oceanside, CA, U.C. San Diego, U.S. Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Erica D. Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Eric C. Chatman v. Nissan Corporation et al
as 8:2018cv01441
Defendant:
Pacific Western Bank, City of San Clemente, Carls Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Foley v. Corey Kaldenbach, et al
as 18-56036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY D. FOLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
COREY KALDENBACH, MARK LAVAKE, LARRY WEBER and others
Chatman v. Nissan Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv04441
Defendant:
Pacific Western Bank, City of San Clemente, Fleetwood, Winnebago, Boundry and others
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foley v. Oceanside Police Department et al
as 3:2015cv01627
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Foley
Defendant:
Oceanside Police Department and City of Oceanside, CA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Boyd v. City of Oceanside Police Department et al
as 3:2011cv03039
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd
Defendant:
City of Oceanside Police Department, Oceanside, City of, San Diego District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
