Cases 1 - 10 of 76
DOE v. LACOLMB et al
as 2:2024cv01843
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
PIERRE LACOLMB, C/O GINDRAW, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2022cv03082
Plaintiff:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, OUTLAW, HERNANDEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jean v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Allrich Jean
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, WARDEN MICHELE FARRELL, WARDEN NANCY GIANETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
GROCE v. CITY OF PHILA. LAW DEPT. et al
as 2:2021cv05132
Plaintiff:
FATEEN GROCE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA. LAW DEPT., OFFICE OF THE CITY SOLICITOR, CIVIL RIGHTS UNIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHEELER v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2021cv04944
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN SHEELER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., BLANCHE CARNEY, WARDEN JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2020cv05081
Defendant:
BAUKUS, DONNA WOELPPER, LARRY KRASNER and others
Plaintiff:
KONATA MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2017cv05060
Plaintiff:
JULIO STEVEN JACKSON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, CITY OF PHILA PA, COMMON WEALTH OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRAZIER v. THE CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2017cv04608
Plaintiff:
MARK S. FRAZIER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILA and THE COMMONWEALTH OF PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv02338
Plaintiff:
ARDELL KENNEDY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JAMES KENNEY, RICHARD ROSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEL et al v. CHUNG et al
as 2:2016cv04013
Plaintiff:
JESSE LEE KEEL, III, CATHERIN C. HENRY and DAVID W. BARRISH
Defendant:
JESSICA CHUNG, MELANIE A. FEUEROR, DAVID W. BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
