Cases 1 - 10 of 356
Clarke v. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2024cv01212
Defendant:
CO H, John Doe #6, Sgt. P and others
Plaintiff:
Jamahl Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Yehl
as 6:2024cv06709
Respondent:
Christopher Yehl
Petitioner:
Omar Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark
as 1:2024cv01152
Petitioner:
Omar Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Burrell v. Globel Tel Link et al
as 9:2024cv01377
Defendant:
Helio, Kinderman, Youngs and others
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeLeon v. Johnson et al
as 7:2024cv08101
Defendant:
Miller, Sergeant Johnson, C.O. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan DeLeon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kingsberry v. The New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2024cv01283
Defendant:
Others Known and Unknown to Plaintiff, The Washington Correctional Facility, Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Shamel Kingsberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Craige Brown et al
as 1:2024cv07804
Defendant:
M.D. Craig Brown, Supervising Probation Officer Elison, Martena Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Jemal R. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Begeot v. Clark et al
as 9:2024cv01255
Plaintiff:
Bryan Begeot
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Corrections Officer Clark and Sergeant Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Craige Brown et al
as 1:2024cv07070
Defendant:
Craig Brown, Supervising Probation Officer Elison, Michael Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Jr Jemal R. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Watson v. Wilhelm et al
as 1:2024cv06826
Defendant:
Tiam Clarke, Daniel J Wadoloski, Isaac Maysonet and others
Plaintiff:
Robert William Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
