Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Parker v. Fleischman et al
as 2:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
John Edwin Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Fleischman, Randy Smith, J Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Sorrell Joseph Jackson
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Randy Smith, Jose Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Gusman, et al
as 2:2018cv10053
Defendant:
Rogelio Perez, B. Montgomery, Correct Care Solutions, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
India Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lomax v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2017cv11673
Plaintiff:
Ralph M. Lomax, Sr.
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Alexa Walker, Marlin Gusman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 2:2016cv13034
Plaintiff:
Terrell L. Chapman
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions and Marlin N. Gusman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fountain v. Correct Care Solutions
as 2:2016cv12661
Plaintiff:
Albert Fountain
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Gusman et al
as 2:2016cv12656
Plaintiff:
Gator James Mitchell
Defendant:
Marlin Gusman and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 2:2016cv12236
Plaintiff:
Ernest George Davis
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Correct Care Solution Mental Health Unit and Unidentified Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Correct Care Solutions
as 2:2016cv10932
Plaintiff:
Herman L. Evans
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Gusman et al
as 2:2015cv05982
Plaintiff:
Philip Geoffry Saunders
Defendant:
Marlin N. Gusman , Correct Care Solutions, Dr. Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
