Cases 1 - 10 of 263
Howard v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2024cv02106
Plaintiff:
Jamayle Howard
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart and Concepcion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuinn v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2024cv01405
Plaintiff:
Leo Braden McGuinn
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas J Dart, Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jamayle Howard
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, Rocco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv16292
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Deon Coleman
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, E Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv16284
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Deon Coleman
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, Amanda Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardona v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv15682
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Edwin Cardona
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, M. Anquiano Oz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Rimsek et al
as 1:2023cv15296
Plaintiff:
Najee James
Defendant:
Rimsek, Acey, Fern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffries v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv15097
Plaintiff:
Dante Jeffries
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtiss v. Lanuza et al
as 1:2023cv15035
Plaintiff:
Daniel Curtiss
Defendant:
Lanuza, M Smith, D. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharkey v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv15030
Plaintiff:
Markees Sharkey
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
