Cases 1 - 10 of 34
MILES v. CASH AMERICA PAWN SHOP et al
as 4:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEWS MILES
Defendant:
CASH AMERICA PAWN SHOP and TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HODGE v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv24738
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT HODGE
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, K WATKINS, D JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cash v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2023cv01170
Petitioner:
Freddie Joe Cash
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cash v. State of Florida
as 1:2023cv22947
Plaintiff:
Freddie Joe Cash
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Neill v. Griffis et al
as 3:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
Cash Aaron O'Neill
Defendant:
Garret Jason Griffis, Christopher Walker, Mike Hauge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cash v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00650
Petitioner:
Freddie Joe Cash
Defendant:
Florida Attorney General
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cash v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00581
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Petitioner:
Freddie Joe Cash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. CASH et al
as 3:2021cv00487
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, MOYE and B CASH
Plaintiff:
JR DONALD R JONES and DONALD R JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOUZE v. MOORE
as 3:2020cv05936
Defendant:
MOORE, B CASH and G KING
Plaintiff:
JEAN LESLY TOUZE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASH v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2018cv02216
Petitioner:
ROBERT PATRICK CASH
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
