Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smith v. Hodge Unit Staff and Admin. et al
as 6:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jacob Charles Smith
Defendant:
Hodge Unit Staff and Admin., Hodge Unit Warden, Hodge Unit Laundry Boss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 1:2022cv00153
Petitioner:
Charles Smith, Jr
Respondent:
State of Texas and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coltart v. State of Texas, et al
as 6:2019cv00464
Defendant:
Thu Le, Olsson LNU, John Doe #5 and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Scott Coltart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Palafox
as 3:2015cv00201
Defendant:
Andrew J. Palafox
Plaintiff:
Gary Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 3:2013cv00337
Defendant:
Elsa Alexander, Norma Avila-Munoz, Rachel Chapa and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Plaintiff:
Gary Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunnicutt v. Stephens et al
as 4:2013cv02024
Plaintiff:
Charles Larry Hunnicutt
Defendant:
William Stephens, P. Bickham, Charles Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Chapa et al
as 3:2013cv00208
Respondent:
Ted Bonnell, Rachel Chapa, Sandra Hijar and others
Notice Only Party:
Magdalena Jara
Petitioner:
Gary Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Thaler
as 1:2009cv00817
Petitioner:
Robert Charles Smith
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Director of TDCJ-CID
as 9:2008cv00050
Petitioner:
James Charles Smith
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv00652
Petitioner:
James Charles Smith
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
