Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Quintana v. Quintana, et al
as 23-4086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
JERLINE QUINTANA, BOARD OF PARDONS, All Chair Members, DAVID BEAL, Parole Agent and others
Quintana v. Shewy, et al
as 23-4085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SHEWY, EDWIN S. WALL, RON FUJINO and others
Quintana v. Clark, et al
as 23-4084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
LOGAN CLARK, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, TODD GAY, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, MIKE HADDON, Executive Director, Utah State Prison and others
Quintana v. Utah State Prison, et al
as 23-4087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
UTAH STATE PRISON, employee, FNU SPOTTS, Officer, FNU GRAHAM, Officer and others
Quintana v. Salt Lake County Metro Jail, et al
as 23-4082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
SALT LAKE COUNTY METRO JAIL, FNU PARK, ADC MEDICAL BUREAU and others
Quintana v. Wirthlin, et al
as 23-4083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY WIRTHLIN, RAYMOND S. SHUEY, DOMAIN SUMMARY and others
Quintana v. Shewy, et al
as 23-4065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SHEWY, EDWIN S. WALL, RON FUJINO and others
Quintana v. Clark, et al
as 23-4063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
LOGAN CLARK, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, TODD GAY, PA, Utah State Prison Clinical Services Bureau, MIKE HADDON, Executive Director, Utah State Prison and others
Quintana v. Utah State Prison, et al
as 23-4064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
UTAH STATE PRISON, FNU SPOTTS, FNU GRAHAM and others
Quintana v. Wirthlin, et al
as 23-4062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHASTITY QUINTANA
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY WIRTHLIN, RAYMOND S. SHUEY, DOMAIN SUMMARY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
