Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DICKS v. TILLMEN et al
as 2:2019cv03168
Defendant:
WARDEN TILLMEN, LT. SIMMONS, LACOMBE and others
Plaintiff:
AKREEM DICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROUGHTON v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2018cv04976
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BROUGHTON, JR.
Defendant:
THOMPSON, WANSLEY, BLANCHE CARNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2017cv05808
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, GERALD MAY, TERANCE CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. CHRISTMAS et al
as 2:2017cv04266
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
A. CHRISTMAS, T. CLARK and B. CARNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WADIS v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2014cv05001
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WADIS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, FARRELL, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv02052
Plaintiff:
JAHMIL MILLER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, D.O.C. COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORBIT v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2013cv04242
Petitioner:
JASON CORBIT
Respondent:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, DETENTION CENTER, CHRISTMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MEADOWS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. MEADOWS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, CORIZON HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRISON v. CHRISTMAS et al
as 2:2012cv01072
Plaintiff:
DARRELL FRISON
Defendant:
A. CHRISTMAS, LOUIS GIORLA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHRISTMAS v. WALSH et al
as 2:2011cv07390
Petitioner:
LYNELL CHRISTMAS
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
