Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Megginson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv06798
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Megginson
Defendant:
The City of New York, Louis Molina, Christopher Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Miller et al
as 9:2022cv01086
Plaintiff:
David Carter
Defendant:
Christopher Miller, Corey, Arquette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staine v. Hochul et al
as 9:2022cv00866
Plaintiff:
Eric Staine
Defendant:
Kathy Hochul, Letitia James, Anthony Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv04369
Plaintiff:
David Carter
Defendant:
Superintendent Christopher Miller, Superintendent Corey, C.O. Arquette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sposito v. Miller
as 9:2022cv00686
Petitioner:
Joseph Sposito
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coley v. Miller
as 9:2022cv00458
Petitioner:
Khari Devon Coley
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York and Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Miller
as 1:2022cv01464
Petitioner:
Julio Perez
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hilton v. Miller
as 9:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
James Hilton
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cisse v. Annucci et al
as 9:2022cv00156
Plaintiff:
Ali Cisse
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Gregory King, Martin Snow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Miller
as 9:2022cv00142
Petitioner:
Edmond Williams
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
