Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Christopher Washington v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 22-16815
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER NATHANIEL WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ, PATRICK COVELLO, T. MEZA and others
Washington v. Young, et al.
as 2:2016cv01341
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathaniel Washington
Defendant:
Young, Weeks, Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Washington v. Warden, Lowell CI, et al
as 15-10798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER NATHANIEL WASHINGTON, a.k.a. Christopher Nathaniel ElBey Washington
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, LOWELL CI and JOYCELYN CATWELL
Washington v. Doe et al
as 5:2015cv00039
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathaniel Washington
Defendant:
John-Jane Doe and Joycelyn Catwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Doe
as 5:2012cv03226
Petitioner:
Christopher Nathaniel Washington
Respondent:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Washington v. Humphreys
as 5:2012cv03224
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathaniel Washington
Defendant:
Karen M. Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Washington v. Humphreys et al
as 5:2012cv03223
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathaniel Washington
Defendant:
Karen M. Humphreys and Mary Correia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Doe et al
as 5:2012cv03225
Petitioner:
Christopher Nathaniel Washington
Respondent:
John Doe and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Washington v. Derral Adam
as 11-16861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER NATHANIEL WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden
Washington v. Adams et al
as 1:2009cv01666
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathaniel Washington
Defendant:
Derral G. Adams, M. Juniors and N. Grannis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
