Cases 1 - 10 of 25
JONES v. EVANS et al
as 1:2023cv14173
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY W. JONES, II
Defendant:
SCHENETTIA EVANS, HARLIE NELSON, ALISHA GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
COLES v. ANDREWS et al
as 1:2023cv03883
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. COLES
Defendant:
RICHARD ANDREWS, AVETTE HARPER and DURANN NEIL, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLE v. NOGAN et al
as 2:2022cv05557
Petitioner:
JAMAINE L. COLE
Respondent:
PATRICK A. NOGAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLY v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv09696
Plaintiff:
TONI FLY and WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY
Defendant:
JAY FERGUSON, DANIEL L HOVCAND, M SEGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLOOM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv21589
Plaintiff:
IRA BLOOM
Defendant:
IAN CONNORS, MR. J. RAY ORMOND, MR. A. CHOPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COLE v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2017cv02017
Plaintiff:
CURTIS COLE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ERIC TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07527
Plaintiff:
JAQUETTA S. COLE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLES v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07464
Plaintiff:
CARNEL R. COLES
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLE v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06986
Plaintiff:
HARVEY COLE, JR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTION FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06997
Plaintiff:
LAMONT M. COLE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
