Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Medina v. Hirsch et al
as 6:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Jose A Medina
Defendant:
Billy Hirsch, Senior Warden Jimmy Bowman, Lisa Mcclain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REYNA v. BIDEN et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
JAVIER REYNA
Defendant:
Joe Biden, United States Attorney General, IZAAK BRUCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyna v. Border Patrol Officer Mathews
as 2:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Javier Reyna
Defendant:
Border Patrol Officer Mathews, Collis White, Tara Zenner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dodge et al
as 2:2018cv00227
Defendant:
Stephen Jabbour, J.A. Collies, Marshall Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Williams, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luper v. Bentley et al
as 4:2018cv00203
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alan Luper
Defendant:
Gina Bentley, Lee A Spears and Alice Collie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luper v. Bentley et al
as 6:2018cv00147
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alan Luper
Defendant:
Gina Bentley, Lee A Spears and Alice Collie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Collis et al
as 6:2014cv00408
Plaintiff:
Donald Berford Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Collis, FNU Martinez, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Warden USP Beaumont
as 1:2014cv00122
Petitioner:
Collie Lee Williams
Respondent:
Warden USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Willard v. Quarterman
as 5:2008cv00033
Petitioner:
Collie B Willard, III
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingram v. Interstate Sanction Facility et al
as 6:2007cv00406
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ingram
Defendant:
Interstate Sanction Facility, Hackberry Unit - Gateway Treatment Facility, Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
