Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Tilley v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Dane Daniel Tilley
Defendant:
Scott Semple, P. Pelzar, L. Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colon v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Angel Colon
Defendant:
Semple and Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colon et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Enrique Colon and Toliver
Defendant:
Semple and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albarran-Gonzal et al v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Joel Albarran-Gonzal and Jason Turoczi
Defendant:
Maldonado, Semple, Gary Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Hanif Aminuddin, Dhati Coleman, Andre Reed and others
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
David Bridges
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Javier Vargas
Defendant:
Maldonado, Semple, Gary Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolterstorff v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Robert Munro Wolterstorff III and Robert Munro Wolterstorff, III
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Guadarrama, McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currytto v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Kevin W. Currytto
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Angel Quiros, William Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colon v. Stover
as 3:2023cv00543
Petitioner:
Luis Aviles Colon
Respondent:
Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
