Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Pedro Valle v. United Stated of America et al
as 2:2023cv00583
Petitioner:
Pedro Valle
Respondent:
United Stated of America and FCC Complex Warden Bryan Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Travis D. Arnold v. B. Lammer et al
as 2:2022cv03894
Petitioner:
Travis D. Arnold
Respondent:
Complex Warden B. Lammer and A. W. Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fernando Gomez v. Lompoc Federal Corrections Complex et al
as 2:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Fernando Gomez
Defendant:
Lompoc Federal Corrections Complex, Warden J. Engleman and C. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Williams v. Lompoc Federal Corrections Complex et al
as 2:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
David Williams
Defendant:
Lompoc Federal Corrections Complex and Wardens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. The Texas Prison Industry Complexes
as 3:2021cv04524
Defendant:
The Texas Prison Industry Complexes
Plaintiff:
Elvis Wayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig Martin Shults v. Complex Warden Bradley
as 2:2020cv10973
Petitioner:
Craig Martin Shults
Respondent:
Complex Warden Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Travis D. Arnold v. Felipe Martinez
as 2:2020cv08694
Respondent:
Complex Warden Felipe Martinez, Jr.
Petitioner:
Travis D. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raymond Thomas v. Complex Warden of USP Lompoc
as 2:2020cv06585
Petitioner:
Raymond Thomas
Respondent:
Complex Warden of USP Lompoc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marlin Lee Gougher v. Acting Complex Warden of Lompoc Low, et al
as 2:2020cv04906
Respondent:
William Barr, Kathleen Hawk, Acting Complex Warden of Lompoc Low and others
Petitioner:
Marlin Lee Goughen and Marlin Lee Gougher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cameron Bell v. Milusnic
as 2:2019cv06697
Respondent:
Complex Warden Milusnic
Petitioner:
Cameron Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
