Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Ray v. Precynthe et al
as 4:2024cv01211
Defendant:
Unknown Conley, Anne Precynthe, Daniel Rector and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Warren County et al
as 4:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Demetrous Armstrong
Defendant:
Lt. Adam Bennett, Sgt. Britany Hertzog, Warren County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farris v. Bennett et al
as 4:2024cv00898
Defendant:
C/O Augie Martin, Sgt. Julie Poirier, Lt. Adam Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley et al v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Pamela Conley and Darwin Conley
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Richard Adams, Allen Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abernathy v. Corizon Health, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00528
Plaintiff:
Randall Abernathy
Defendant:
Corizon Health, LLC, Sandra Zakroft, Philip Tippen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Woodcock et al
as 4:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Mr. Marlow Johnson
Defendant:
COI Unknown Woodcock, COI Unknown Weiss, COI Unknown Moffit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peyton v. City of St. Louis Department of Public Safety Division of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00631
Defendant:
C.O. Robinson, City of St. Louis Department of Public Safety Division of Corrections and L.T. Conley
Plaintiff:
Errol Otis Peyton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conley v. USA
as 4:2020cv00754
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Edward Conley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Conley v. USA
as 4:2020cv00753
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Edward Conley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Behlmann v. Shrader et al
as 2:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jeremy R. Behlmann
Defendant:
J. Shrader, Joe Goodwin, Jim Willer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
