Cases 1 - 10 of 27
CONWAY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2016cv09550
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CONWAY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, WARDEN OF CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GROOVER v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2016cv09428
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOSEPH GROOVER
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, STEPHEN PRATT, BRYAN CONWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GREENE v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2013cv05493
Plaintiff:
RONALD B. GREENE
Defendant:
MICHAEL PEREZ, THOMAS DOMBROWSKI, ANTHONY MARTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conway v. Torres
as 2:2012cv05700
Petitioner:
CHARLES D. CONWAY
Respondent:
WILFREDO TORRES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LIDDELL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2012cv02669
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LIDDELL
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE HAYMAN, BERNARD GOODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONWAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2012cv01412
Petitioner:
CHARLES D. CONWAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GOODWIN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2012cv01040
Plaintiff:
RASHIED K. GOODWIN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SOMERSET COUNTY PROSECUTOR OFFICE, EDWARD CONWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORIANO v. THE COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2012cv00466
Plaintiff:
GEGXAN CORIANO
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF CAMDEN, TROUT, MACHIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. CONWAY et al
as 1:2011cv06095
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SCOTT
Defendant:
CRAIG CONWAY, ADULT DIAGNOSTIC & TREATMENT CENTER, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
