Cases 1 - 10 of 14
(PC) Robey Hairston v. CDCR et al
as 2:2020cv01680
Defendant:
US Courts, CDCR Wardens, CDCR Doctors and others
Plaintiff:
Robey Hairston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hairston v. CDCR et al
as 1:2020cv01226
Defendant:
US Courts, CDCR Wardens, CDCR Doctors and others
Plaintiff:
Robey Hairston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Espinosa v. Corcoran Prison
as 3:2020cv05803
Petitioner:
Jose Espinosa, Sr
Respondent:
Corcoran Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CABRERA
as 1:2019at00606
Petitioner:
GABRIEL CABRERA
Defendant:
CORCORAN PRISON WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Kiskaden v. Corcoran Prison, et al.
as 1:2017cv01547
Plaintiff:
Roger Kiskaden
Defendant:
- Corcoran Prison, Associate Wardens, Chief Medical Doctors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogelio Ruiz v. R. Mobert
as 17-17311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGELIO MAY RUIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
R. MOBERT, Official Regular at CSATF Corcoran Prison
Crosby v. Hashemi et al
as 1:2016cv01264
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Crosby
Defendant:
Nastran Hashemi and CDCR - Corcoran Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre Wells v. T. Cagle, et al
as 13-17277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE LAVAR WELLS
Defendant - Appellee:
T. CAGLE, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran Prison, DE LA CRUZ, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran Prison, A. MACIAS, Correctional Sergeant at CSP-Corcoran Prison and others
Brounche Green v. Connie Gibson, et al
as 13-15833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BROUNCHE STEPHAN GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNIE GIBSON, Warden of Corcoran State Prison, DIAZ, Captain/ Correctional Officer at California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation- Corcoran State Prison, VARIZ, Captain/Correctional Officer at California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation Corcoran State Prison and others
Barger v. CSP-Corcoran et al
as 1:2013cv00353
Plaintiff:
Gary Dale Barger
Defendant:
CSP-Corcoran and Corcorans Prison Law Library
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
