Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Robinette v. Purpura et al
as 1:2023cv03531
Plaintiff:
Brandon Corey Robinette
Defendant:
Judge Nancy Purpura, Lisa Dever and Dianna Abramowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dove v. Gelsinger et al
as 1:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Dove
Defendant:
Warden Denise Gelsinger, Corizen Medical Staff/Company, Warden Gregory Werner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Darden et al
as 1:2022cv02060
Plaintiff:
Brandon Corey Lassiter
Defendant:
E.C.I. Warden D. Darden, Chief of Security Mulligan, Lt. Griffiths and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Darden et al
as 1:2022cv02062
Plaintiff:
Brandon Corey Lassiter
Defendant:
Warden D. Darden, Chief of Security Mulligan, Assistant Warden Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
France v. CO II Corey Holland et al
as 1:2021cv03167
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey France
Defendant:
CO II Corey Holland, Captain Daniel Barnes, Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dove v. Warden of MCIH et al
as 1:2021cv02371
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Dave and Corey Lee Dove
Defendant:
Warden of MCIH, Cleveand Friday, Robin Woolford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hammond v. USA-2255
as 1:2021cv02718
Petitioner:
Corey Anthony Hammond
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dove v. Friday et al
as 1:2021cv02372
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Dove
Defendant:
Cleveland Friday, C.O. Elijah Garnett and Lt. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Small v. Green et al
as 8:2020cv02835
Plaintiff:
Tavon Devaughn Small
Defendant:
Corey Walk, Robert Green, Michael Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Grant v. Warden
as 1:2020cv02447
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Corey Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
