Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Dillon v. Correction Corporation of America et al
as 2:2020cv02319
Defendant:
Mr. Kutz, Mrs. Bonnie Holley, Mrs. Laurer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Dillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodrum v. Churchill County Detention Center et al
as 3:2020cv00540
Defendant:
John Scott, Churchill County Detention Center, Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bond v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2020cv00780
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Justin Marzec, Derek Jappe and others
Plaintiff:
Earl H Bond, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2020cv00203
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Core Civic, NDOC and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2020cv00201
Defendant:
State of Nevada, I.C. Solutions, Core Civic and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2020cv00202
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Core Civic, NDOC and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Core Civic, NDOC and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2019cv02109
Defendant:
Scott, Clark County Detention Center, Veronica Marquez and others
Plaintiff:
Leland Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. USA
as 2:2019cv01742
Respondent:
Nevada Highway Patrol Corporation, Minneapolis Police Department, Minnesota United States District Court and others
Petitioner:
Peter R Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2018cv00519
Defendant:
Gerri Lynn Hardcastle, William G. Cobb, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
