Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Rodriguez v. Martinez et al
as 4:2023cv04146
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Rodriguez, III
Defendant:
Virginia Martinez, Craig Findley, Christine Brannon-Dortch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv50309
Plaintiff:
Alex J. Dawson
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes, Tarry Williams, Craig Findley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avant v. Raoul et al
as 1:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Cordell Avant
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Rob Jeffreys, Craig Findley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avant v. Jefferies et al
as 1:2023cv01100
Petitioner:
Cordell Avant
Respondent:
Rob Jefferies, Danielle Coryle and Craig Findley
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 1:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Attorney General's Offices of the State of Illinois, The, Kimberly Foxx and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
Henry Gill
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Craig Findley, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2021cv01337
Plaintiff:
Henry Gill
Defendant:
J. B. Pritzker, Craig Findley, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeCap v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2021cv01229
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael DeCap
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Craig Findley, Rachel Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Raoul et al
as 4:2021cv04048
Defendant:
Dorrie Love, Chad Schuldt, Craig Findley and others
Plaintiff:
Udell Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruth v. Nicklaus et al
as 3:2020cv50104
Defendant:
Craig Findley, Rod Jefferys and Sonja Nicklaus
Plaintiff:
Anton Ruth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
