Cases 1 - 10 of 30
(PC) Bland v. Messinger et al
as 2:2020cv00051
Defendant:
A. Munoz, C.R. Glenn, D. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Rodriguez v. Albonico et al
as 2:2019cv01108
Defendant:
D. Cox, J. Jackson, K. Loftin and others
Plaintiff:
David Arnold Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Davis v. MacComber et al
as 2:2019cv00848
Defendant:
D. Cox, Carla Delgado, F. Rodreguez and others
Plaintiff:
Tim Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Loftin et al
as 2:2018cv01605
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lyn Brooks
Defendant:
K. Loftin and D. Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John W. Williams v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2016cv00138
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Brown v. Cox et al.
as 2:2015cv02518
Plaintiff:
Jacky J. Brown
Defendant:
D. Cox, L. Davis, K. Martines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Jordan et al.
as 2:2015cv02474
Plaintiff:
Terrell D. Hall
Defendant:
G. Jordan, B. Nicole, Jian Ma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Toussaint v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2015cv03557
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Toussaint
Jeremy Giles v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2015cv03393
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Giles
Shawn Carter v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2015cv03250
Defendant:
Edmund G Brown, Jr, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Carter
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
