Cases 1 - 10 of 46
SURDAKOWSKI v. DIXON et al
as 5:2024cv00216
Defendant:
E JONES, C M CACCAMIS, T MILLS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SURDAKOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SOLITARY WATCH et al
as 4:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
JESSIE W JONES
Defendant:
SOLITARY WATCH, DONALD J TRUMP, JOHN KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2024cv00573
Petitioner:
Larry D. Jones
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HODGE v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv24738
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT HODGE
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, K WATKINS, D JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. INGRAM et al
as 5:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
BERNARD D WILSON
Defendant:
INGRAM, GRANGER, D JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Texiera
as 6:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Gerrard D. Jones
Defendant:
Sergeant Texiera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nicotra v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 8:2023cv01442
Plaintiff:
Gerard Nicotra
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Ricky Dixon, Edward Jackson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Venuto et al
as 5:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Julian Anderson
Defendant:
Gary Venuto, Karen Mercaldo, Simona Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOKE v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL TODD COOKE
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, WATKINS, D JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNS v. MAY et al
as 3:2022cv10927
Plaintiff:
CALVIN DUNELL BURNS
Defendant:
SCOTT MAY, ALEX CARRANZA, ROBBINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
