Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Coretchi v. USCIS et al
as 3:2023cv02005
Petitioner:
Oleg Coretchi
Respondent:
USCIS, DHS/ICE and Warden of Prairieland Detention FAC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Siddiqui v. DHS-ICE et al
as 3:2022cv02507
Plaintiff:
M Siddiqui
Defendant:
DHS-ICE, NFN Johnson, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujan Trevino v. Gutierrez et al
as 5:2020cv00180
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Clerk of Immigration Court, Social Security Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Reyes Lujan Trevino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Xuan v. DHS ICE Director Thomas Homan et al
as 9:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
Bui Phu Xuan
Defendant:
DHS ICE Director Thomas Homan and DHS ICE Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madu v. Fort Worth Police Department et al
as 4:2013cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony C Madu
Defendant:
Fort Worth Police Department, Joni White, Gene Messer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrieta v. Karshner et al
as 1:2010cv00279
Petitioner:
Juan Barrieta
Respondent:
Karshner, Port Isabel Detention Center , DHS/ICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shameem v. Port Isabel Detention Center et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Petitioner:
Safraz Marlon Shameem
Respondent:
Port Isabel Detention Center, Medical Department / Dr. Paredo and DHS / ICE / ATSI
Defendant:
Ahtna Technical Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guzman v. Hall et al
as 6:2010cv00087
Petitioner:
Arturo Guzman
Respondent:
Keith E. Hall, Corrections Corporation of America and DHS-ICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
O'Sullivan v. DHS/ICE et al
as 1:2010cv00210
Petitioner:
Kern O'Sullivan
Respondent:
DHS/ICE, ATSI and Port Isabel Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. ATSI et al DO NOT DOCKET IN 1:10CV205. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 1:10CV203
as 1:2010cv00205
Petitioner:
Kemar R James
Respondent:
ATSI , DHS/ICE and Various Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
