Cases 1 - 10 of 154
Murry v. Caughron et al
as 4:2024cv05019
Plaintiff:
Roy Howard Murry
Defendant:
Desaraye Caughron, Derek Anderson, Gabriel Lapsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Wise et al
as 4:2023cv05143
Plaintiff:
Robert Hill and Robert J Hill
Defendant:
Todd Wise, Jon Coers, Aaron Kershaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsel v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Eric Townsel
Defendant:
Kenneth Sawyer, David Kenney, Sandra Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marlow Eggum v. Donald Holbrook
as 23-35491
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARLOW TODD EGGUM
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD HOLBROOK
Wright v. Inslee et al
as 2:2023cv00854
Plaintiff:
Brandon David Wright
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Cheryl Strange, Jack Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaspal Gill v. Donald Holbrook
as 23-35363
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASPAL SINGH GILL
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD HOLBROOK, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary
Gregory Brown v. Cheryl Strange, et al
as 23-35145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHERYL STRANGE, Secretary of Corrections, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, in their individual and official capacities, SCOTT J. RUSSEL, Deputy Secretary of Corrections and others
Moore v. Holbrook
as 4:2022cv05170
Petitioner:
Kenneth J Moore
Respondent:
Donald Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christensen v. Holbrook
as 3:2022cv05619
Petitioner:
Jay M Christensen
Respondent:
Donald Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Strange et al
as 4:2022cv05094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyree Brown
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Stephen Sinclair, Scott Russel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
