Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Drake v. MS Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Drake
Defendant:
MS. Dept of Correction, Mrs. Collier, Mary Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. MS Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Drake
Defendant:
MS Dept. of Corrections, Kitchen Supervisor Unknown Collier, Mrs., Food Service Manager Mary Williams, Mrs. and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Brooks et al
as 5:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Elijah Hall
Defendant:
Carmen Drake Brooks, Adams County Circuit Court, Stanley Search and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Almond v. Lauderdale County et al
as 3:2018cv00851
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Officer Angelica Drake, Billie Sollie, Officer Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Eugene Almond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adele v. Rogers et al
as 1:2014cv00448
Plaintiff:
David Adele
Defendant:
Terry Rogers, Adam Drake and Preston Goff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake v. Epps et al
as 3:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
Julius Drake
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Jerry Buscher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drakes v. T.C.C.F. et al
as 3:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Dario Drakes
Defendant:
T.C.C.F., C.O.C.F., P. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. DCF Employees et al
as 4:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Eric B. Drake
Defendant:
DCF Employees, Dennis Waller, L. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballard v. Richland Police Department et al
as 3:2009cv00234
Plaintiff:
Deon Scott Ballard
Defendant:
Richland Police Department, Dalton J. McDonald, Benjamin L. Drake and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
