Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mason v. Anderson et al
as 2:2020cv00236
Plaintiff:
Deondray Mason and Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Brian Janow, Joe Tovar, Daniel Pacheco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dustin Anderson v. Timothy Filson, et al
as 18-15299
Petitioner - Appellant:
DUSTIN ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMOTHY FILSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Todrick Morris v. Augustine Melendrez, et al
as 17-10381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODRICK MORRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
AUGUSTINE MELENDREZ, Correctional Supervisor, ANASTASIO P. MADRID, Correctional Supervisor, DUSTIN ANDERSON, Correctional Supervisor and others
Anderson v. Nevin
as 2:2015cv02245
Petitioner:
Dustin Anderson
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Dwight Nevin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George Jones v. Dustin Anderson
as 15-10514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DUSTIN ANDERSON, Sergeant
Morris v. Melendrez et al
as 2:2015cv00128
Plaintiff:
Todrick Morris
Defendant:
Augustine Melendrez, Anastasio P Madrid, Dustin Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julius Evans v. M. Phommahaxay, et al
as 15-10131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIUS CURTIS EVANS, also known as Julius Evans, also known as Julius C. Evans
Defendant - Appellee:
M. L. PHOMMAHAXAY, BRAD LIVINGSTON, BARRY L. MARTIN and others
Evans v. Phommahaxay et al
as 2:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Julius Curtis Evans
Defendant:
M L Phommahaxay, Brad Livingston, Barry L Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Livingston et al
as 2:2014cv00116
Plaintiff:
Julius Curtis Evans
Defendant:
B Livingston, Barry L Martin, James Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Anderson
as 2:2013cv00122
Plaintiff:
George Alvin Jones
Defendant:
Dustin Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
