Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Davis v. Zephyrhills Correctional Institution et al
as 8:2024cv00805
Plaintiff:
Dale Antwon Davis
Defendant:
Zephyrhills Correctional Institution and Suwanne Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Zephyrhills Corrections
as 8:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Dale A. Davis
Defendant:
Zephyrhills Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIES v. WARD et al
as 5:2019cv00486
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES, SEPUTY WARDEN PETER EADDIE, SCOTT CRICKMAR and others
Plaintiff:
DALE SCOTT DAVIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Wakulla Correctional Institution/Annex et al
as 3:2018cv00895
Plaintiff:
Dale A. Davis
Defendant:
Wakulla Correctional Institution/Annex and A. Varona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2018cv00153
Plaintiff:
DALE ANTWUN DAVIS
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and A RALPH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIES v. DEAL et al
as 5:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
DALE SCOTT DAVIES
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, GREGORY DOZIER, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2018cv00250
Plaintiff:
Dale Antwun Davis
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2017cv00666
Plaintiff:
DALE ANTWUN DAVIS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, PERSONNEL CONTRACTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00701
Plaintiff:
Dale Antwon Davis
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Warden, Santa Rosa, CI, Personnel Property Sgt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIES v. WILLIAMS
as 7:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
DALE SCOTT DAVIES
Defendant:
STANLEY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
