Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Trim v. Bickham et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Joseph Trim
Defendant:
Earist D. Bickham, Nurse at DCI, Doctors at DCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Peterson et al
as 2:2022cv05274
Plaintiff:
Wesley Dewayne Pierce
Defendant:
G Peterson, Corporal Christman, Deputy Lujuan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trim v. Bickham et al
as 3:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Joseph Trim, Sr.
Defendant:
Edward D. Bickham, Dan LeFleur and Patricia Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pizarro v. USA
as 2:2020cv02980
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dan Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mitchell v. Fleming
as 3:2020cv00664
Plaintiff:
Dan Mitchell
Defendant:
Ashleigh Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimble v. Lexus of New Orleans et al
as 2:2018cv07918
Defendant:
Lexus of New Orleans, Victor J. Woods, Jr., Jefferson Parish Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Kimble, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond H. Kimble, III v. Lexus of New Orleans et al
as 3:2018cv00299
Defendant:
19th Judicial District Office of Public Defenders, 24th Judicial District Public Defenders Office, Delatte, Edward & Marcantel and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Kimble, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Claitor et al
as 3:2017cv00417
Plaintiff:
Field Calhoun
Defendant:
Dan Claitor
Unknown Named Legislature:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornelius v. Webster Parish et al
as 5:2017cv00529
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Cornelius
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office Webster Parish, Dan Weaver, Marvin Garett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Looney v. Garland DPS Office et al
as 2:2016cv13459
Plaintiff:
Randall Gene Looney, II
Defendant:
Garland DPS Office and Dan Scheel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
