Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Tamez v. Gonzalez et al
as 5:2022cv00540
Plaintiff:
Darryl Tamez
Defendant:
Abel Gonzalez and Cynthia Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Garvin et al
as 6:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Darryle D. Chatman
Defendant:
Jeremy Garvin, Lacy Rosson and Charles Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv00597
Plaintiff:
Darryl D Bonner
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2011cv00414
Plaintiff:
Darryl D Bonner
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of , Oklahoma Department of Corrections , Joseph Harp Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hinton v. James Crabtree Correctional Center et al
as 4:2011cv00216
Petitioner:
Darryl L Hinton
Respondent:
James Crabtree Correctional Center and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hinton v. James Crabtree Correctional Center et al
as 5:2011cv00253
Petitioner:
Darryl L Hinton
Respondent:
James Crabtree Correctional Center and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hinton v. Bowers
as 5:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
Darryl L Hinton
Defendant:
Donna Bowers and Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2010cv00065
Plaintiff:
Darryl L Hinton
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Justin Jones and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00869
Plaintiff:
Darryl D Bonner
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Raymond Muse, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Dennis et al
as 4:2009cv00390
Plaintiff:
Darryl L Hinton
Defendant:
James Dennis, Joe S Vassar, David N Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
