Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Nagipejutawin v. Director of Floyd Co. Jail et al
as 4:2023cv00298
Petitioner:
Nagipejutawin and Julia Catherine Stanley
Respondent:
Director of Floyd Co. Jail and Floyd Co Sheriff Dave Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eads v. Cheney et al
as 3:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
David Eads
Defendant:
Dr. Dave Cheney and Stanley Holden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nagipejutawin v. Roberson et al
as 4:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Nagipejutawin and Julia Catherine Stanley
Respondent:
Dave Roberson and Allen Pledger
Defendant:
Bob Couey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hazelton v. Wooten et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Bernard Toshiro Hazelton
Defendant:
Sgt. Stevie Wooten and M.D. Dave Cheney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Twitty v. Cheney et al
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Demetric Twitty
Defendant:
Dave Cheney, Beverley Murray and Telfair State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hazelton v. Wooten et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Bernard Toshiro Hazelton
Defendant:
Stevie Wooten and Dave Cheney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVE v. STONE
as 3:2020cv00041
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Shailesh Dave
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson et al v. Foster Bail Bonds et al
as 1:2020cv02369
Plaintiff:
Terrence Anderson, Leonard Brown, LB and others
Defendant:
John Doe, Walter Foster, Karen Blackmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 7:2020cv00040
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
SHAILESH DAVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sturgis v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv03440
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dave Montonio Sturgis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
