Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00217
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CONLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv01155
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROWLAND CONLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES C. FOX, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Rowland Young v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
as 5:2014cv02598
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Care Services, Lee, Unnamed CDCR Employees and others
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
CONLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv01359
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROWLAND CONLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES C. FOX, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Holman
as 3:2014cv01014
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
Marcia A. Holman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Pennwell et al
as 3:2014cv01010
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
Sandra Pennwell, Amy Miller, David Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. California Corrections Prisons Organization Association
as 3:2014cv01012
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
California Corrections Prisons Organization Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. California Correctional Health Care Services, Office of Third Level Appeals Health Care et al
as 3:2014cv01011
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Care Services, Office of Third Level Appeals Health Care, L. D. Zamora, Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Unnamed Secretary
as 3:2014cv01013
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Defendant:
Unnamed Secretary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Rowland Young v. The United States of America
as 2:2014cv01528
Defendant:
The United States of America
Plaintiff:
David Rowland Young
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
