Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Dutcher v. Foley et al
as 4:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Michael Dutcher
Defendant:
David Vandergriff, Trevor Foley, Chrystal Schmitz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hornsey v. Vandergriff
as 4:2024cv00958
Petitioner:
Donald C. Hornsey
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Potosi Correctional Center et al
as 4:2024cv00858
Defendant:
Jody Glore, Employees That Work For Potosi, Potosi Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Terrell Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Vandergriff
as 4:2024cv00623
Petitioner:
Rico Paul
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valley v. Vandergriff
as 4:2024cv00608
Petitioner:
Robert Valley
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hutson v. Vandergriff
as 2:2024cv04051
Petitioner:
Calvin Hutson
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, Missouri Department of Corrections, Bed Broker at Fulton Reception Diagnostic Center (2015) and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Shattuck-Knaebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Rico Paul
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Caleb Thompson, Justin Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jared Williams v. David Vandergriff
as 24-1620
Plaintiff:
Jared Williams
Defendant:
David Vandergriff
McKay v. Vandergriff
as 4:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
Daniel McKay
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
